The Fields Confessed: Forced Labor, Racial Geography, and the Unfinished Business of Abolition at Angola

By Andrea Hagan, Criminologist & Founder, Pattern Hunters LLC

My mother died on Saturday, May 16, 2026.

On Tuesday, May 26, 2026 — the morning before I stood over her grave — U.S. District Judge Brian Jackson issued a 60-page opinion finding that the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola forces incarcerated men to labor under heat conditions that violate the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

She used to say it plainly, the way Black mothers say things that are true before the rest of the world catches up: they will put us back in the fields. She did not mean it as a metaphor. She meant it as prophecy. The fields are real. The heat is unconstitutional. A federal court has now said so in writing.

And then that same court said it could do nothing about it.

She handed me this work the same week she left. I received it the way you receive an inheritance you were not ready for — with grief in one hand and obligation in the other. I am a criminologist. I read rulings the way a doctor reads an X-ray — looking for what the image reveals and what it conceals. What Judge Jackson’s opinion reveals is that incarcerated men at Angola have been subjected to conditions a federal court has deemed cruel and unusual. What it conceals — or rather, what it declines to address — is the deeper constitutional and moral question the Promise of Justice Initiative placed before it: whether the Farm Line itself, independent of any heat index, constitutes a system of punishment and racial subjugation rooted in Louisiana’s history of slavery.

The court looked at the thermometer. It declined to look at the land.

This analysis looks at the land.

The Land Did Not Change. Only the Paperwork Did.

To understand what is happening at Angola in 2026, you have to read the geography honestly. Not as a backdrop. As an argument.

The Louisiana State Penitentiary sits on 18,000 acres in West Feliciana Parish. It is the largest maximum-security prison in the United States. Its name — Angola — comes from the plantation that occupied this land before the Civil War, which itself took its name from the West and Central African homeland of the enslaved people who worked it (Peoples Dispatch, 2025). The naming was not incidental. It was a declaration of continuity. We know where you came from. We know what you are here to do.

In 1880, Confederate Major Samuel James acquired the lease for Louisiana’s convicts and consolidated several plantation properties to form what became the Angola prison farm. Mancini (1978) documented that under James, men worked in the fields for long hours — often to death — and established that the convict lease system is best understood not as prison history but as part of the elaborate social system of racial subordination previously assured by slavery. The brutality was not incidental. It was structural. In 1901, the state of Louisiana purchased the property and established the Louisiana State Penitentiary on the grounds (Peoples Dispatch, 2025). Angola had gone from a plantation to a convict-leasing camp to a state prison. As Rice (2022) documents, the conditions persisted across all three iterations — the brutal, forced labor of mostly Black people in the fields, generating revenue for the state at a margin no free labor market could sustain.

The land did not change. Only the paperwork did.

The Promise of Justice Initiative — the New Orleans-based civil rights organization that brought VOTE v. LeBlanc alongside Rights Behind Bars on behalf of Voice of the Experienced (VOTE) and currently incarcerated plaintiffs — names this directly: “Slavery never ended in Louisiana. The U.S. never abolished slavery. Forced labor is everywhere in Louisiana. People in prisons, mostly Black, are invisible to the public and are forced to work under oftentimes dangerous, sometimes humiliating conditions at their own physical peril. Labor is extracted, always at the threat of violence, for pennies an hour or nothing at all” (Promise of Justice Initiative, 2025).

That is not rhetoric. That is the documented record.

My mother knew it before they put it on a website.

Chadarius Morehead knew it the moment he stepped onto the Farm Line. He said he knew Angola used to be a plantation. That his grandfather had told him how his ancestors worked in Louisiana’s hot sun. He felt that history within himself as he labored (The Lens, 2026). And at night, he kept having the same dream: he is in Angola’s pecan grove in the dark, and he sees bodies hanging from the trees. When he moves closer, he realizes every corpse is him.

That nightmare is not a psychological curiosity. It is a confession from the body — the body’s way of telling the truth that the court refused to hear. The land that produced that dream is the same land Judge Jackson measured with a thermometer and called unconstitutional. But the thermometer cannot measure what Morehead’s grandfather passed down to him. It cannot measure the weight of working a field where your ancestors bled. It cannot measure the distance between what this country promised and what it has delivered — on this land, to these men, in this heat.

This is what the court declined to reckon with. Judge Jackson measured the heat index. He did not measure the weight of the land.

The Purpose of the Breaking

Frederick Douglass wrote about Edward Covey in 1845. Covey was a “negro-breaker” — a man whose entire professional purpose was the systematic destruction of the will. Not the punishment of a specific offense. Not the correction of behavior. The annihilation of the self. Douglass described what the breaking did to him — how it transformed a thinking, feeling human being into what he called a brute. How it rendered his intellect useless. How the dark night of slavery closed in around him until he could not see himself anymore.

Douglass survived Covey because he fought back. He named the breaking for what it was: not punishment, but submission training. Not justice, but manufacturing.

The Farm Line is Covey. And the state of Louisiana is in the business of manufacturing submission.

The labor is described by attorneys as “pointless” — picking rotten watermelons, weeding grass by hand, watering crops with Styrofoam cups (The Appeal, 2024).

The pointlessness is not a flaw in the design. It is the design.

The labor does not need to produce anything except the experience of being forced to labor. The message is delivered in the doing, not in the product. You are here to be broken. Not to produce. To submit.

Then consider what Terrance Winn said. Winn spent three decades at Angola and was forced to work the Farm Line. He stood on the steps of the Promise of Justice Initiative’s office on May 27, 2026, the day after the ruling, and said: “Angola is still a slave plantation. People should know. Slavery never ended for us” (Promise of Justice Initiative, 2026).

And then he said something that carries the weight of this entire analysis.

Many men choose to go to solitary confinement rather than work the Farm Line. People would rather lose their minds than endure it.

Do not mistake that choice for preference. That is criminology speaking — the kind that does not need a laboratory because the laboratory is 18,000 acres of former plantation land in West Feliciana Parish, and the findings are written in the bodies of the men who chose four walls and silence over the fields.

Solitary confinement is documented in the peer-reviewed literature as one of the most psychologically devastating conditions a human being can be subjected to — leading to severe psychological distress, self-injury, suicide, and permanent cognitive impairment (Cloud, Garcia-Grossman, & Armstrong, 2023). Men at Angola know this. They have lived inside it. And they still choose it over the Farm Line.

What that tells us, through Freyd’s (1996) Betrayal Trauma framework, is that the Farm Line produces a category of harm that solitary confinement — as devastating as it is — does not reach. Solitary breaks the present. It fractures the mind through isolation. The Farm Line breaks something older and deeper. It breaks the ancestral self. It forces a man to reenact, in his own body, on the same land, the precise labor that was extracted from his people before the Civil War. It does not merely punish him for what he did. It conscripts him into performing what was done to his people.

That is a different category of harm.

The system was not designed to rehabilitate. It was not designed to correct. It was designed to break. And the Eighth Amendment, which Judge Jackson correctly found was violated by the heat conditions, does not address the breaking. It addresses the heat.

The breaking continues.

The Compounding: Race, Age, Disability, and the Weathered Body

The men on Angola’s Farm Line are not an undifferentiated mass. They are individuals whose bodies carry the specific burdens of their specific lives — and those burdens compound in ways the Farm Line does not acknowledge, cannot accommodate, and was never designed to consider.

At Angola, the intersection is race, age, disability, and incarceration — four systems of disadvantage converging on men who are then forced into agricultural labor in unconstitutional heat (Crenshaw, 1991).

Begin with race and the body. Public health researcher Arline Geronimus proposed the weathering hypothesis in 1992 to explain why Black Americans experience earlier onset of chronic disease and accelerated biological aging compared to white Americans of the same chronological age. The answer was not genetics. It was cumulative stress — the physiological cost of living in a society that subjects Black people to structural barriers, material hardship, interpersonal discrimination, and persistent threats to identity and safety (Geronimus, 1992). Weathering, she argued, literally wears down the heart, the arteries, and the neuroendocrine systems — all body systems — so that a person becomes chronologically old at a young age.

These are the bodies that arrive at Angola. These are the bodies that the state of Louisiana then sends into 113-degree heat index conditions, with inadequate water breaks, inadequate medical accommodations, and the threat of solitary confinement for refusal.

A weathered Black body on the Farm Line in a Louisiana August is not the same as an unweathered body in the same conditions. For a man with hypertension, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease — conditions that disproportionately affect Black men precisely because of the weathering that racism produces — those same conditions are not merely uncomfortable or unjust.

They are potentially lethal.

This is the ADA claim at the center of VOTE v. LeBlanc. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires reasonable accommodation for incarcerated people with disabilities. The Farm Line provided none. Men with documented heat-sensitive medical conditions were sent into the fields alongside everyone else, because the system was not designed around their humanity. It was designed around their labor.

Age compounds this further. Angola houses men serving life sentences — men who entered as young adults and have grown old inside its walls. Bixby, Bevan, and Boen (2022) document that 66% of incarcerated people self-report a disability, with Black, Hispanic, and multiracial disabled men especially overrepresented in state and federal prisons. Two-thirds of the men on that Farm Line, statistically, are living with a disability. The Farm Line was not designed for two-thirds. It was designed for all.

The intersectional argument is this: the Farm Line does not harm everyone the same way. It harms Black men with weathered bodies, aging frames, and documented disabilities more severely than it harms anyone else — and Black men with weathered bodies, aging frames, and documented disabilities are precisely the population the Farm Line disproportionately holds.

Louisiana did not accidentally build a system that breaks down the bodies of Black men. It built a system that extracts from those bodies everything they have left to give — and then calls the extraction punishment.

The Constitutional Confession and Its Limits

On May 26, 2026, Judge Brian Jackson did something that almost never happens in American jurisprudence: he wrote, plainly, that a state institution was subjecting human beings to unconstitutional conditions — and then declined to make it stop.

The mechanism was Parker v. Hooper, decided by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in March 2026. In that case, the court ruled that if a state can demonstrate it took any action toward remedying a potential Eighth Amendment violation — no matter how thin, no matter how ineffective — it is cleared of liability.

Angola installed shade pavilions. It handed out water.

And under Parker, that gesture was sufficient to absolve the state of a condition Jackson himself called unconstitutional.

Jackson wrote it directly: “Before Parker, the Court would have found Defendants liable under the Eighth Amendment for acting with deliberate indifference to the health and safety of incarcerated persons working the farm line” (VOTE v. LeBlanc, 2026).

The Eighth Amendment was written as a floor — the minimum below which the state could not sink in its treatment of incarcerated people.

Parker v. Hooper turned the floor into a ceiling the state could always reach by doing almost nothing.

Install some shade. Hand out some water. Document that you handed out the water. And the constitutional violation — the one the judge found, the one he put in writing — evaporates on contact with that documentation.

This is Diane Vaughan’s normalization of deviance (1996) operating at the appellate level. The deviance became normalized not through ignorance but through institutional recalibration of the standard. The standard moved. The harm did not.

The deeper constitutional claim — the Thirteenth Amendment argument that the Farm Line is not a condition of confinement but a continuation of a system the Constitution was supposed to have ended — was dismissed at the pleading stage. It never reached the merits. W.E.B. Du Bois documented in Black Reconstruction in America (1935) that Reconstruction represented the most radical democratic experiment in American history — and that its violent termination by white supremacist paramilitaries was not the end of a failed project but the suppression of a successful one. Pope (2019) extends that analysis directly to the Thirteenth Amendment, arguing that the Republican framers never intended the criminal exception to authorize mass racial coercion. The reading that prevails today — that a conviction strips a person of all constitutional protection against servitude — triumphed not because it was correct but because those same paramilitaries cleared the way for white supremacist state governments to expand convict leasing without constitutional challenge.

The interpretation that prevails today is the interpretation of those who wanted slavery to continue.

Louisiana has had chances to correct this. In 2022, voters in Alabama, Tennessee, Vermont, and Oregon amended their state constitutions to remove language allowing slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for crime. Louisiana put Amendment 7 on the ballot the same year. The legislative sponsor of the amendment, State Rep. Edmond Jordan, ultimately urged voters to reject his own measure after it was watered down to the point where it could have expanded rather than limited forced labor (Louisiana Illuminator, 2022). Six out of ten Louisiana voters opposed it.

Eight states have now closed the loophole — Colorado (2018), Utah (2020), Nebraska (2020), Alabama (2022), Oregon (2022), Tennessee (2022), Vermont (2022), and Nevada (2024).

Louisiana watched its neighbors move and chose the fields.

Dignity Is Not a Reward for Good Behavior

There will be those who read this analysis and say: but these are men who committed crimes. Some of them committed serious crimes. Why should they be protected from conditions a federal court found unconstitutional?

That question contains its own answer, and the answer is the Eighth Amendment.

The Eighth Amendment does not say cruel and unusual punishment is prohibited except for the most serious offenders. It does not scale constitutional protection to the severity of the offense. Judge Jackson did not find that the heat conditions were unconstitutional for some classes of offenders. He found they were unconstitutional. Full stop. The constitutional protection applies to everyone the state confines, regardless of why they are confined.

But the argument goes deeper than the Constitution. The more important argument is the one the Promise of Justice Initiative makes plainly: “Incarcerated people are no less human than anyone else and are deserving of basic safety, dignity, and freedom from degrading, unconstitutional treatment” (Promise of Justice Initiative, 2026).

That is not a legal argument. That is a moral one. And it is correct.

We speak in this country about the right to die with dignity. We have built entire legal and medical frameworks — living wills, hospice care, palliative medicine — around the principle that a human being approaching death deserves to do so with dignity intact. But we have not built the equivalent framework around the right to live with dignity inside a cell.

That asymmetry is its own indictment.

The Promise of Justice Initiative fights for Justice, Dignity, Freedom, Autonomy, and Mercy. All five of those values are violated by the Farm Line — simultaneously, systematically, and on land that has been violating them in the same way for 125 years.

Frederick Douglass survived Covey and became one of the most consequential voices in American history. The question of who a person is at the worst moment of their life is not the same question as who they become when they are given the conditions for transformation. The Farm Line is designed to prevent transformation. Breaking is not rehabilitation.

Breaking is the opposite of rehabilitation.

PJI’s Client and Family Assistance Program serves hundreds of incarcerated people and their families throughout the Louisiana prison system — ensuring that clients know there are people who will always take their call, who take an interest in their lives, and who reaffirm their humanity by knowing them as people (Promise of Justice Initiative, 2025). That program exists because the institution they are inside is actively working to strip that humanity away.

The CFAP is the counter-architecture. The Farm Line is the architecture it is countering.

The Geography of the Fight

The Promise of Justice Initiative operates out of an office at 1024 Elysian Fields Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana 70117.

That address is not incidental to this analysis.

Elysian Fields Avenue was laid out in 1805 by French engineer Nicholas de Finiels as part of Bernard de Marigny’s Faubourg Marigny development — a subdivision built on the former Marigny plantation (NOLA.com, 2018). De Finiels named the avenue Champs-Élysées, inspired by the Parisian boulevard, itself a reference to the Elysian Fields of Greek mythology — the paradisiacal afterlife reserved for heroes deemed worthy by the gods. The avenue runs five miles, from the Mississippi River to Lake Pontchartrain, cutting through the full geographical history of New Orleans.

In Greek mythology, the Elysian Fields are where the worthy dead find rest. The heroes rest there. The fight is over. The suffering ends.

My mother warned of one set of fields — the fields of subjugation, the fields of extraction, the fields her people were stolen to work, and her descendants were never supposed to escape. She said it plainly: they will put us back in the fields. She was not wrong.

But the men fighting to end the Farm Line are doing it from another set of fields entirely — Elysian Fields, where Greek mythology says the worthy finally rest, where the resistance has made its home, where the torch is kept lit on plantation ground in a city built by people who were never supposed to be free.

The Promise of Justice Initiative sits on a street named for paradise, built on a plantation, in a city constructed by enslaved people, fighting a prison that is a plantation, to free men working fields that were always plantations.

The fight has never moved. The address changed. The institution changed its name. But the land, the labor, the bodies, and the resistance are all occupying the same geography they have always occupied. That is not symbolism. That is the material reality of what Gilmore (2007) calls carceral geography — the spatial logic of racial capitalism made visible in the streets we walk and the addresses we occupy and the fields where men are still being broken on land their ancestors bled to build.

My mother warned of the fields of punishment. The Promise of Justice Initiative fights from the fields of paradise.

That is the geography of this fight. And it is the geography of this piece.

The Pattern Louisiana Refuses to Name

The Farm Line does not exist in isolation. It exists as part of a comprehensive system of racial control that the Promise of Justice Initiative has been dismantling, project by project, for years.

Jim Crow Juries — Louisiana’s practice of non-unanimous jury verdicts, rooted in a 1898 constitutional convention explicitly designed to silence Black jurors, resulted in PJI filing over 1,000 post-conviction relief applications for people still incarcerated on unconstitutional convictions. Louisiana alone, among all fifty states, has refused to grant retroactive relief to those convicted under the unconstitutional law. The U.S. Supreme Court said the verdicts are unconstitutional going forward. Louisiana said the people already convicted under them can stay in prison anyway.

With the destruction of voting rights under Callais v. Louisiana and the aggressive state-level assault on Black political power, Louisiana sits as the center of the country’s neo-Confederate political project — using redistricting and legislation to breathe life into Jim Crow and continuously harm Black communities, as PJI’s own analysis states.

The Farm Line. Jim Crow juries. The rejection of Amendment 7. The refusal of retroactivity for unconstitutional convictions. The death penalty was applied along racial lines.

These are not separate failures of a flawed but well-intentioned system. They are the system. They are the pattern.

Kovera (2019) documents that racial disparities in the criminal justice system are well-documented and widespread — and that exposure to extreme racial disparities can lead people to support the very policies that produce those disparities, perpetuating a vicious cycle. Louisiana has been inside that cycle since 1865. The Thirteenth Amendment’s criminal exception gave the state the legal architecture. The Black Codes gave it the intake pipeline. Convict leasing gave it the economic model. The modern prison farm gave it the infrastructure. And Parker v. Hooper gave it the judicial permission to continue.

The pattern is not hidden. It is governing.

What the Fields Confessed and What Must Follow

A federal judge looked at Angola’s Farm Line and found it unconstitutional. He put that finding in sixty pages of federal jurisprudence. And then he walked away.

The closest parallel in the Western moral tradition is Pontius Pilate. Matthew 27 records that Pilate found no fault in Jesus — said it plainly, on the record, in public. And then he called for a basin of water, washed his hands before the crowd, and declared: I am innocent of this man’s blood. It is your responsibility. He did not deny the injustice. He documented it. And then he absolved himself of the obligation to stop it.

Judge Jackson’s opinion is sixty pages of handwashing. He found the fault. He named it unconstitutional. He wrote — plainly, on the record, in a federal court opinion — that before Parker v. Hooper, he would have found the state liable. And then the Fifth Circuit handed him the basin. The lowered standard was the water. And the men on the Farm Line are still in the field.

The difference between Pilate and Jackson is that Pilate at least performed the washing in public — made the abdication visible, named it as abdication. The robe is still black. The basin is just harder to see. But the result is the same: a man in a position of authority looked at a demonstrable wrong, confirmed it was wrong, and passed the consequence to someone else.

Pilate passed it to the crowd. Jackson passed it to the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit passed it to the Louisiana Department of Corrections. And the Louisiana Department of Corrections passed it back to the Farm Line.

What he left behind is a confession without a consequence — the most Louisiana thing imaginable. The state has been making this confession for 125 years. The land confessed when they named the prison after the homeland of the people they stole to build it. The law confessed when it put the criminal exception in the same sentence as the abolition of slavery. The legislature confessed when it refused retroactivity for Jim Crow jury convictions. The voters confessed when they rejected Amendment 7. And the Fifth Circuit confessed when it lowered the constitutional floor far enough that shade pavilions and a water break could absolve a state of a practice a judge called cruel and unusual.

My mother said they would put us back in the fields. She was right. She is still right. And she died the week a federal court confirmed it and declined to make it stop.

The Promise of Justice Initiative has been responding to these confessions for years — in the courts, in the legislature, in the streets, from an office on Elysian Fields Avenue, where the mythology of paradise meets the material reality of plantation ground, where the worthy are supposed to finally rest but have not yet been given the conditions to do so.

They fight for Justice, Dignity, Freedom, Autonomy, and Mercy — because the state of Louisiana has been systematically denying all five to the same population, on the same land, using the same legal architecture, since before any of us were born.

The fields confessed. The torch is lit.

The question is not whether Louisiana’s forced prison labor system violates the Constitution. A federal judge already answered that. The question is what we do when the law confesses to a violation and then declines to remedy it. What we do when the floor is lowered by design. What we do when eight other states close the loophole, and Louisiana watches them go.

The answer — the only answer that has ever worked in this fight — is the one the Promise of Justice Initiative already knows: you document the pattern, you name it precisely, you build the coalition, you take it back to court, you bring it to the legislature, you tell the story until the story cannot be ignored.

My mother handed me this work. I received it the week the fields confessed, and the court walked away.

Pattern Hunters is here for that work.

Same script. But not the same cast. Not anymore.

Andrea Hagan is a criminologist and the founder of Pattern Hunters LLC, a public scholarship platform that focuses on criminology, community engagement, and accountability. Further information is available at patternhunters.com.

A companion policy brief — including statutory analysis, model legislation, and recommended action steps for the Louisiana Legislature, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Louisiana, and the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections — is available by request at andrea@patternhunters.com.

References

Callais v. Louisiana, 647 F. Supp. 3d 367 (M.D. La. 2022).

Bixby, L. E., Bevan, S., & Boen, C. (2022). The links between disability, incarceration, and social exclusion. Health Affairs, 41(10), 1460–1469. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00495

Cloud, D. H., Garcia-Grossman, I., & Armstrong, A. (2023). Public health and prisons: Priorities in the age of mass incarceration. Annual Review of Public Health, 44, 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071521-034016

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Douglass, F. (1845). Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass, an American slave. Anti-Slavery Office.

Du Bois, W. E. B. (1935). Black reconstruction in America. Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Freyd, J. J. (1996). Betrayal trauma: The logic of forgetting childhood abuse. Harvard University Press.

Geronimus, A. T. (1992). The weathering hypothesis and the health of African-American women and infants: Evidence and speculations. Ethnicity & Disease, 2(3), 207–221.

Geronimus, A. T., Hicken, M., Keene, D., & Bound, J. (2006). “Weathering” and age patterns of allostatic load scores among Blacks and whites in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.060749

Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. University of California Press.

Kovera, M. B. (2019). Racial disparities in the criminal justice system: Prevalence, causes, and a search for solutions. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 1139–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12355

Louisiana Illuminator. (2022, November 8). Louisiana voters reject ban on slavery, involuntary servitude; author also opposed it. https://lailluminator.com/2022/11/08/louisiana-voters-reject-ban-on-slavery-involuntary-servitude-author-also-opposed-it/

Mancini, M. (1978). Race, economics, and the abandonment of convict leasing. The Journal of Negro History, 63(4), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/2717131

NOLA.com. (2018, June 8). New Orleans’ own Champs-Elysees was once extraordinary — and could be again. https://www.nola.com/entertainment_life/home_garden/new-orleans-own-champs-elysees-was-once-extraordinary—-and-could-be-again/

Peoples Dispatch. (2025, February 23). Black prisoners organize for dignity in Angola, Louisiana’s modern-day plantation. https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/02/23/black-prisoners-organize-for-dignity-in-angola-louisianas-modern-day-plantation/

Pope, J. G. (2019). Mass incarceration, convict leasing, and the Thirteenth Amendment: A revisionist view. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3357059

Parker v. Hooper, No. 23-30133 (5th Cir. March 2026).

Promise of Justice Initiative. (2025). End plantation prisons. https://labor.promiseofjustice.org/

Promise of Justice Initiative. (2025). Client and family assistance program. https://promiseofjustice.org

Promise of Justice Initiative. (2026, May 27). Court finds constitutional violations at Angola but refuses to end racist forced labor practice [Press release]. https://promiseofjustice.org

Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. 83 (2020).

Rice, S. (2022). Divide and cultivate: The role of prisons and Indian reservations in U.S. agricultural imperialism. Food and Foodways, 30(1–2), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2022.2030935

The Appeal. (2024, July 4). Judge orders changes to Louisiana prison labor program likened to ‘19th century slavery.’ https://theappeal.org/angola-prison-farm-line-ruling-louisiana/

The Lens. (2026, February 6). Angola Farm Line trial testimony reveals traumas tied to field labor. https://thelensnola.org/2026/02/06/angola-farm-line-forced-labor-trial-louisiana/

Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press.

VOTE v. LeBlanc, 3:23-cv-01304-BAJ-EWD (M.D. La. May 26, 2026).

Watson, M. F. (2023). Caste and Black intergenerational racial trauma in the United States of America. Family Process, 63(2), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12955

Westmont, V. C., & Schaefer, J. M. (2023). An archaeology of convict leasing in the American South. Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21619441.2023.2178758